Legal Opinion

McGrath v. Wallace

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1890No. 13302PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

The action is to quiet title, accompanied with a prayer for possession, the complaint alleging that defendants are in possession, claiming an interest in the property, but without right. Judgment for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying a motion for new trial, defendants appeal. Defendant Mary A. Wallace became the owner of the property in fee, April 23,1862. In 1865 the property became delinquent for taxes. Suit was brought under the statute then in force for the recovery thereof, resulting in a judgment and order of sale. At the sale Eli Mayo became the purchaser. The court finds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayor and Common Council of San Jose v. TrimbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Cranmer v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Huling v. SeccombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. McGrath v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Lee v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API