De Arguello v. Greer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, J.
The plaintiffs being in possession of certain real property described in the complaint, brought an action as authorized by the two hundred and fifty-fourth section of the Practice Act, against the defendants as persons claiming some estate or interest therein adverse to the plaintiffs, for the purpose of determining such adverse claim, estate or interest.
The premises in controversy are situated in San Mateo *621County, and constitute as claimed by the plaintiffs a part of the “ Rancho de las Pulgas, or the Pulgas Rancho,” as the same has been surveyed and patented under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Davis v. RainsfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Miller v. DaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Matteson v. McCartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Phelan v. PoyorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Brackebush v. DorsettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891