Legal Opinion
Smith v. Mt. Diablo Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1976No. Civ. 36871PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, P. J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether Code of Civil Procedure sections 860-870 (the validating statutes) govern a school district’s contract for the purchase of a computer. We conclude that they do not.
Appellants, as taxpayers, commenced this action for injunctive and declaratory relief against respondents Mt. Diablo School District (District), the members of the board of education (Board), superintendent of the District, and International-Business Machines Corporation (IBM).
On November 13, 1973, the Board passed a motion that bids be called for on the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- McLeod v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- California Commerce Casino, Inc. v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. NeerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.