Legal Opinion
People v. Neer
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1986No. G001782PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, Acting P. J.
Dana Neer appeals (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (m))1 after pleading guilty to several controlled substance violations. He claims his suppression motion should have been granted because: (1) the warrant issued to search his home was not supported by probable cause; (2) the search pursuant to the defective warrant cannot be salvaged by the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule (United States v. Leon (1984) 468 U.S. 897 [82 L.Ed.2d 677, 104 S.Ct. 3405]); and (3) the warrant was executed in violation of the knock-notice requirements of section 1531. We agree…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Service Employees International Union v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.