Legal Opinion

People v. Yut Wai Tom

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1981PublishedCited by 255 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Meyer, J.

Defendant’s right to counsel at a postarraignment lineup conducted in the absence of counsel was waived *48where defendant’s counsel, having arranged with the prosecutor the physical details of the lineup and the questions to be asked and having discussed with defendant his reasons for not remaining for the actual lineup and obtained defendant’s consent, advised the prosecutor that the lineup should proceed in his absence, even though defendant did not himself communicate the waiver to the prosecutor and counsel was not in defendant’s presence when he did. While the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by255 opinions

  1. People v. CharlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. BeamNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API