Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Hodge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1956No. 36753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief justice.

This action was brought 'by Edna L. Hodge, hereinafter referred,to as plaintiff, against the City of Tulsa, Charles H. Clark and Robert W. Hodge-for damages allegedly sustained as a result of an automobile collision. Upon trial of the action the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff against the defendants City of Tulsa and Charles H. Clark and judgment was rendered thereon from which said defendants have perfected this appeal.

The factual situation involved may be briefly stated as follows: on January 9, 1953, shortly after 9:00 p. m., plaintiff was riding as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. GoodnatureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Tankersley v. WebsterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Oklahoma City v. HaggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Dallas v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Miller v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. City of Ardmore v. HendrixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API