Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CALAMCO, No. 2:21-cv-01201-KJM-KJN 12 Plaintiff and ORDER B Counterclaim Defendant, 14 v: 15 J. R. Simplot Company, et al., 16 Defendants and Counterclaimants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff CALAMCO and defendant J.R. Simplot Company dispute CALAMCO’s 20 | obligations under a contract related to a fertilizer known as UAN 32. CALAMCO moves for 21 | judgment in its favor on the pleadings and moves to dismiss portions of Simplot’s counterclaims. 22 | As explained in this order, the court cannot conclude as a matter…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.