Legal Opinion

In re the Complaint of Ingram Barge Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 13, 2016No. Civil Action No.: 13 C 3453, Civil Action No.: 13 C 4292PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge:

Before the Court are several motions relating to the April 18, 2013 barge allision at the Marseilles Dam located near Marseilles, Illinois. The United States has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), or, alternatively, for summary judgment pursuant *772to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), as to all claims and counterclaims against it arising from this incident. (R.747). In particular, the United States seeks immunity from liability pursuant to the Flood Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 702c,…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles Warrick v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  2. Great Scott National Sales, Inc. v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  3. Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Rosas v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API