Chittenden v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: Mining Act of 1872; 30 U.S.C. § 26; Fifth Amendment Takings Clause; Motion to Dismiss; RCF.C 12(b)(1); Summary Judgment; RCFC 12(b)(6); 36 C.F.R. § 224.8.
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action, Gene Chittenden and Allen D. Hall, hold unpatented mining claims on two lode mines located in the Tahoe National Forest in California. Plaintiffs claim that when the United States Forest Service installed bat gates on the shaft and portal of the mines it “intentionally, negligently and [tortiously]” destroyed their claims, violated their rights under the Fifth Amendment’s…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nottage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Stevens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Straw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017