Legal Opinion

Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1988No. 86-1060PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

In October 1983, appellants Oscar I. Do-dek, Mildred S. Dodek, and Samuel M. Do-dek II (the “Dodeks”) sued appellees John J. Mason, Stuart A. Bernstein, Richard S. Cohen, MBC Associates, 1001 Pennsylvania Associates, and CF 16 Corporation claiming damages based upon alleged breach of contract, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. These claims related to three contracts pursuant to which the Dodeks sold commercial real estate in the District of Columbia. After some discovery, the Dodeks moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability. All the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Thorsten P. Sundberg v. TTR Realty, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Howard University v. Good Food Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API