Legal Opinion

Ebert v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 27, 2001No. [No. 27, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bruñe, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiffs-appellants, trading as George Ebert & Sons, the Eberts, appeal from a judgment N.O.V. for the defendant-appellee, Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co., the Insurance Company, in a suit on a fire insurance policy. The policy covered loss by fire or lightning and the claim in controversy on this appeal is for damage by lightning to a wall, which, together with other structures, enclosed the lot upon which stands the building covered by the policy now in controversy. The principal question is whether the wall was or was not covered by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickler Engineering Corp. v. Seminar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Montauk Corp. v. SeedsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Hankins v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Brownstein v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Marks Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. DeJamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API