Legal Opinion
Carter v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 22, 2008No. AC 28712PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The pro se petitioner, Anthony Carter, appeals following the denial of certification to appeal from the judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying certification to appeal and improperly dismissed his petition as a successive petition pursuant to Practice Book § 23-29 (3). We conclude that the record is inadequate to review the petitioner’s claim and, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the petitioner’s appeal. In 2002,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Negron v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Kearney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Zollo v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Carter v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.