Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 20, 2010No. AC 30314PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Lawrence R. Smith, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing in part his claims of ineffective assistance of trial and habeas counsel and finding that his remaining claims were barred by principles of res judicata. The court granted the petitioner’s petition for certification to appeal. We affirm the judgment of dismissal by the habeas court and its determination that the petitioner’s remaining claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

The present habeas petition relates to the petitioner’s convictions in two different criminal cases, the first…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Boyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Moody v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  5. Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API