Legal Opinion
Askmo v. Askmo
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 2000No. B133807PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
Appellant Pierre Askmo appeals from an order granting respondent Hakima Askmo’s motion for spousal support and attorney’s fees. The order was entered while a prior appeal by appellant was pending. In that appeal, appellant challenged an order granting respondent’s motion for relief from a default judgment. We remanded the case with directions to reconsider the order. {In re Marriage of Askmo (May 31, 2000, B131692) [nonpub. opn.].) In the instant appeal, we affirm the order from which the appeal is taken.
Factual and Procedural Background1
“The parties were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Christian Research Institute v. AlnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Kington v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gruen v. GruenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Metis Development LLC v. BohacekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In Re Marriage of SellersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.