Legal Opinion

Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc. v. McNeil Real Estate Fund VI, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 12, 1992No. 91-8032PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

In this case we interpret Section 621(a)(2) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. §§ 521-559 (1988) (the “Cable Act”). Section 621(a)(2) grants cable companies which have been franchised by a governmental franchising authority a right to access “public rights-of-way” and “easements ... which have been dedicated for compatible uses.” 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(2) (1988). Below, appellee Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc., d/b/a Smyrna Cable TV (“Smyrna Cable”), a franchised cable company in Cobb County, Georgia, brought an action pursuant to Section 621(a)(2) in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. AxtellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Media General Cable of Fairfax, Inc. v. Sequoyah Condominium Council of Co-OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Al-ArianDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  4. Cable Holdings Of Georgia, Inc. v. Mcneil Real Estate Fund Vi, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Liberty Cablevision v. Municipality of BarcelonetaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API