Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 21, 1927No. 18080PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Special Justice.
This proceeding is one for contempt of this court. We believe that a statement of facts preceding the filing of the motion before this court, out of which grew the charges herein being tried, will be helpful in obtaining a clear understanding of the discussion hereinafter indulged.
In 1921 a large number of minority stockholders of the Riverside Oil & Refining Company commenced an action in the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., against the said company,. O. O.. Owens, and others having control and management of said company and its affairs, charging…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In re WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dancy v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Best v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.