Geisberg v. O'Laughlin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of tlie district court for Hennepin county, Brooks, J., denying a.motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, X
Action to set aside a judgment on tlie ground that it was procured by fraudulent practices of defendant and her attorneys. Plaintiff had judgment in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The facts in the case are as follows: In January, 1888, one Stewart was the owner of a tract of land in Hennepin county, and mortgaged the same to one Vianden to secure the payment of the sum of $3,500. The mortgage and the debt secured thereby were thereafter duly assigned to the plaintiff in this action. Subsequent to the execution of the mortgage defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wieland v. ShillockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Spooner v. SpoonerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3Cited by22 opinions
- McElrath v. McElrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Brockman v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of MelgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Bloomquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.