Nelson v. Auman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
This matter is before the court a second time. For a more detailed statement of facts see our prior decision. Nelson v. Auman, 216 Minn. 407, 408, 13 N. W. (2d) 38, 39. Subsequent to that decision, wherein this court sustained the order of the trial court striking plaintiff’s answer to intervener’s complaint as sham, frivolous, and false, intervener served a notice of motion for judgment for the relief demanded in its complaint. Pursuant to this notice of motion, plaintiff (appellant herein) appeared in court and requested that he be given an opportunity to offer testimony.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Muellenberg v. JoblinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JobeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Johnson v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Commissioners of Aitkin County v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Public Service Co. of NM v. First Judicial Dist. CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Dieseth v. CALDER MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.