Legal Opinion
Tesch v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 9, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-3956PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Third-party defendants Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, John Tingaba, Esquire and Linda S. Martin, Esquire, (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Ballard”) filed this Motion to Dismiss or Strike Defendant United States’ Amended Third-Party Complaint against them. Since matters outside the pleadings were submitted, I shall treat the motion as one for summary judgment. 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons the motion is granted.
Plaintiff, a representative of the estate of William Hoick, filed suit against the United States under the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Watergate Landmark Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. Wiss, Janey, Elstner Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- Pyramid Condominium Ass'n. v. MorganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Bike v. American Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Morris v. LenihanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Pennine Resources, Inc. v. Dorwart Andrew & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.