Legal Opinion
Pennine Resources, Inc. v. Dorwart Andrew & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 10, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-6308PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAHN, District Judge.
Third-party defendants, KMG Main Hurdman (a public accounting firm) and James R. Nace (collectively, “Main Hurdman”) filed a motion to dismiss the third-party complaint of Dorwart Andrew & Company (a public accounting firm) and W. Scott Stoner (collectively, “Dorwart Andrew”). For the reasons set forth below, the third-party defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
This action arises out of the sale of Dutchmaid, Inc. stock to plaintiff Pennine Resources, Inc. (“Pennine”). Pennine filed an amended complaint in December of 1985. That complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- D.P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Bucks County Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams Controls, Inc. v. Parente, Randolph, Orlando, Carey & AssociatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Morris v. LenihanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Finderne Management Co. v. BarrettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. StedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.