Legal Opinion
John Harris v. City of Akron
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1994No. 93-3056PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Senior-Circuit Judge.
We must decide in this case whether the owner of real estate that was demolished by city officials is foreclosed from recovering damages in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because of his failure to plead and prove that no adequate state law remedy existed by which he could pursue his claim. Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Vicory v. Walton, 721 F.2d 1062 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 834, 105 S.Ct. 125, 83 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984). The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants, and we now affirm on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Jerry Lorenzo Bass, A/K/A Afif Abdul R. Karriem v. Kevin Robinson James LashbrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Charles W. Warren Ruth Warren v. City of Athens, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Fox v. Van OosterumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Angelo DiLuzio v. Village of Yorkville OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Thompson v. AsheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.