Legal Opinion
Fox v. Van Oosterum
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1999No. 98-1022PublishedCited by 178 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J., joined by Daughtrey, J.,
CLAY, J. (pp. 354-58), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Jason Matthew Fox appeals from the summary judgment dismissal in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”) action against Mason County officials and Mason County. Fox alleges that defendants violated the Fourth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments and state law by refusing to return his driver’s license and by initiating a prosecution that resulted in a 60 day “discretionary time” sentence. With respect to Fox’s driver’s license claim against Mason County and Sheriff…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Sammye R. Holloway v. Sally Brush Clermont County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.