Robbins v. Frank Cooper Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Judgment for the plaintiff has been entered on a verdict by the jury based on plaintiff’s contention that defendants-appellants have utilized in the production of the television program “ Dotto ” an original idea developed and expressed in a program format which plaintiff had delivered to defendants-appellants who are television producers and agents for writers and television producers. The jury’s general verdict rested in part on plaintiff’s testimony that the material and format were submitted on defendants-appellants’ invitation.
The format was tangible enough physical property of value in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Cole v. Phillips H. Lord, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Healey v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Healey v. R.H. MacY Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- American Mint Corp. v. Ex-Lax, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Krisel v. DuranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Werlin v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Schuler-Haas Electric Corp. v. Wager Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Decorative Aides Corp. v. Staple Sewing Aides Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Radio Today, Inc. v. Westwood One, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.