Legal Opinion

American Mint Corp. v. Ex-Lax, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from an order entered at Special Term, New York county, whereby defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted to the extent of dismissing, as insufficient in law, the second cause of action set forth in the amended complaint. For the purpose of this motion, the following summary of the facts, which are alleged in the second cause of action, must be conceded to be true:(a) For a long time prior to October 1, 1938, plaintiff was, and ever since that date has been, thoroughly experienced in the manufacture, packaging and marketing of compressed candy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Healey v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Healey v. R.H. MacY Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Rodriguez v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Rodriguez v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vantage Point, Inc. v. Parker Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  2. Brunner v. Stix, Baer & Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Kamin v. KUHNAUOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. De Filippis v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  5. Plus Promotions, Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API