Legal Opinion
Krisel v. Duran
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1966No. 65 Civ. 2702PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff by this action seeks thirty million dollars damages, injunctive relief, an accounting and to impress a trust. The defendants are the Economic Development Administration of Puerto Rico (EDA), its administrator, Rafael Du-rand, its economic consultant, Sam J. Van Hyning, 1 and Phillips Petroleum Company (Phillips).
The essence of plaintiff’s claim is that he conceived a novel and original program for the development of a petro-chemical plant in Puerto Rico and for obtaining a substantial oil import quota therefor; that it was revealed in trust and confidence to…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Fifty Associates, a Massachusetts Corporation v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Robert F. Urbano v. The Board of Managers of the New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Norton J. Lehman v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Jackson Sawmill Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.