Legal Opinion
CLPF-Parkridge One, L.P. v. Harwell Investments, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 31, 2005No. 04SA182PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOBBS, Justice.
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, we hold that section 13-80-104(l)(b)(II), C.R.S. (2004) does not bar cross-claims and third-party claims for indemnity or contribution in construction defect lawsuits; rather, this section also allows indemnity or contribution claims to be brought by a separate lawsuit but no later than ninety days after termination of the construction defect lawsuit. 1 Based on statutory and legislative history analysis, we conclude that section 13-80-104(l)(b)(II) is a statute of limitations tolling provision; not, as the trial court ruled, a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Lobato v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Benton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Anderson v. Longmont Toyota, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- People v. NullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- People v. WeissSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Board of County Commissioners of the County of San Miguel v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.