Legal Opinion
Cemex, S.A. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 28, 2004No. Nos. 04-1058, 04-1080PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement and National Cement Company of California (collectively, “Ad Hoc”) appeal the decision of the United States Court of International Trade denying its motion to enforce the judgment entered against Cemex, S.A. (“Cemex”), a Mexican importer of gray Portland cement, in Cemex, S.A. v. United States, 20 CIT 1272 (1996), aff'd 133 F.3d 897 (Fed.Cir.1998) (“Cemex I”). In that case, Ad Hoc successfully obtained an increase in the amount of antidumping duties calculated by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- International Trading Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Juice Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc., and International Cargo and Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hutchison Quality Furniture, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Nec Solutions (America), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Arp Materials, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Rimco Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- SSAB North American Division v. United States Bureau of Customs & Border ProtectionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.