Legal Opinion

Strom v. Buholz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1951No. File 9166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSickel, J.

This is an action brought by Joseph H. Strom and Helga M. Strom, his wife, as plaintiffs, against Mabel Buholz and Dora F. Williams, defendants, for the specific performance of an option for the purchase of a tract of land on the south shore of Lake Kampeska. The circuit court entered judgment requiring that defendants execute and deliver to plaintiffs a warranty deed to the property and for costs, and the defendants appealed.

On March 25, 1925, a lease was entered into between Maggie E. Williams, then owner of the land, and H. H. Sand, for a term of ten years at an annual rental of twenty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. House v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Phillis v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Nowicki v. KopelczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Huffman v. CooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Grynberg Exploration Corp. v. PuckettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re GridleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1992
  4. Habeck v. SampsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Cameron v. ScherfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API