Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Scherf

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1954No. File 9381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*224RUDOLPH, J.

Plaintiffs seek to compel defendant to convey to plaintiffs certain property which under the terms of a written lease, plaintiffs had an option to purchase. The trial court entered judgment which requires that defendant convey the premises to plaintiffs upon payment of the purchase price. Defendant has appealed. We affirm the judgment.

The facts are: Under a written lease dated June 4, 1947, defendant leased the premises to plaintiffs for a period of five years. This lease contained an option to purchase as follows:

“And said lessees are hereby granted an option to buy the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dwight v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Skinner v. StoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Petre v. SlowinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Strom v. BuholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Hartman v. GragerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Lininger v. Black Hills Greyhound Racing Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cameron v. ScherfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API