Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Cooley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Roberts County. Hon. Frank McNulty, Judge. Suit by Charles Huffman against Mary E. Cooley and another. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.

In this equity case findings of fact and judgment were made and' rendered in favor of defendants. Plaintiff moved for new trial, which motion was granted, and defendants appeal, *477urging as error that the trial court erred in granting ■ a new trial and setting aside and vacating the report of the referee and judgment. It is the contention of appellants that the evidence submitted on the trial was wholly insufficient to warrant the court in granting plaintiff the relief by injunction prayed for in the complaint, and that therefore the court erred in granting a new trial and in vacating the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williamson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Thompson v. PiocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Betts v. LetcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Richie v. OwsleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. PiersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Strom v. BuholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Harker v. CowieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Sayre v. Village of AlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Petty v. LanganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API