Legal Opinion

Habeck v. Sampson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1974No. 11343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

This case is here on appeal for the second time. In the first appeal, we reversed and remanded for the purpose of giving defendants an opportunity to establish whatever defenses were available to them by calling their own witnesses. Habeck v. Sampson, 87 S.D. 73, 202 N.W.2d 868. After retrial, as in the first case, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs decreeing specific performance of the property in question. Defendants have appealed from that judgment.

At the first trial, plaintiff’s case consisted of the testimony of the defendants, who were called -as adverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Christiansen v. StrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Eggers v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Skjoldal v. MyrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Shumway v. KitzmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wiggins v. ShewmakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ralph E. Mueller and Eugene D. Devane, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Hubbard Milling Company, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. Amdahl v. LoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Lamore Restaurant Group, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API