Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Golden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1972PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Plaintiffs, the prevailing parties on this appeal, have filed a petition for allowance of attorney fees incurred in preparing respondents’ brief and in other work related to this appeal. In support of that petition plaintiffs refer to a provision of the contract between the parties for allowance to the prevailing party of reasonable attorney fees “in said suit or action.” ① It is also contended that “this provision now includes attorney fees on appeal by reason of the enactment of ORS 20.096 which provides that the prevailing party to any suit on such a contract shall recover his attorney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adair v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Krishell Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. ScheiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Jewell v. Triple B. Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API