Legal Opinion
Ludgate v. Somerville
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1927PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is a suit to enjoin the violation of certain deed restrictions upon lots in Laurelhurst Addition to the City of Portland. This addition was platted in 1908 and all deeds subsequently executed contained restrictions, the purpose of which was to establish a strictly residential district. The restrictions ran for a period of 25 years from and after January 1, 1909. Laurelhurst has 117 blocks subdivided into 2,135 lots. It is bounded on the north by Halsey Street; on the south by East Stark Street; on the east by East 43d Street; and on the west by East 32d Street. The northwest corner of.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Windemere-Grand Improvement & Protective Ass'n v. American State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Duester v. AlvinOregon Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Farmer v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Bethea v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.