Legal Opinion
Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings Unit
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 16, 1984No. C6-83-2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [DNR] has petitioned for a writ of certiorari to review decisions of the Todd County Hearings Unit concerning proposed public waters and wetlands designations. The Hearings Unit is a three-member body created by statute to determine those designations proposed by the DNR which are challenged by landowners or counties. Minn.Stat. § 105.391. The Todd County Hearings Unit rejected DNR-proposed designations in a number of cases, including the seven on appeal here.
The DNR challenges the evidentiary support for these decisions,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Gibson v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Signal Delivery Service, Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Action Against the Dentist License of WangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- City of Lake Elmo v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Big Fish Lake Sportsmen's Club, Inc. v. State, Water Resources BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Department of Natural Resources v. Mahnomen County Hearings UnitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987