Legal Opinion
Big Fish Lake Sportsmen's Club, Inc. v. State, Water Resources Board
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 10, 1987No. C6-86-1389PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the Minnesota Water Resources Board establishing the boundaries of the Sauk River Watershed District. Relators, Big Fish Lake Sportsmen’s Club and Matthew Peters, oppose the Board’s decision to include Big Fish Lake in the watershed district. They contend the Board’s decision is unsupported by substantial evidence and is arbitrary and capricious.
FACTS
Minnesota Water Resources Board (Board) established the Sauk River Watershed District in central Minnesota covering approximately 1,036 square miles and including land in Stearns,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Lake Elmo v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re the Enlargement & Increasing the Number of Managers of the Brown's Creek Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001