Legal Opinion
City of Lake Elmo v. City of Oakdale
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1991No. C8-90-1723PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Respondent landowners own adjoining parcels of real property located within the boundaries of appellant City of Lake Elmo (Lake Elmo). The landowners filed a petition with the Minnesota Municipal Board (Board) for concurrent detachment and annexation of their properties from Lake Elmo to respondent City of Oakdale (Oak-dale) pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 414.061, subd. 5 (1988).
The Lake Elmo city council filed a resolution with the Board opposing the landowners’ petition. After proper notice and a hearing, the Board issued Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Northern States Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings UnitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Township of Thomastown v. City of StaplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Forest Lake v. Minnesota Municipal BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range PlanningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994