Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1957No. 36,844, 36,845, 36,846, 36,847, 36,848, 36,849PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Commissioner.

Six actions were brought by the State of Minnesota to determine adverse claims to the beds of certain lakes and connecting streams in Crow Wing County. The state alleged that it was the owner in fee simple of the lands constituting the beds of these lakes and streams. The riparian owners answered and alleged that, since the waters involved were nonnavigable, they were the owners in fee simple of the beds of these waters. The actions were consolidated for trial. By stipulation, the court limited the issue for determination to the navigability of the waters involved,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Johnson v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Parks v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API