Legal Opinion

Resident Action Council v. Seattle Housing Authority

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2013No. 87656-8PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 This direct appeal concerns the public disclosure of Seattle Housing Authority (SHA) grievance hearing decisions pursuant to the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW SHA hearing decisions contain *426welfare recipients’ personal information. This information is exempt from disclosure under the PRA, but the PRA requires redaction and disclosure of public records insofar as all exempt material can be removed. Accordingly, the PRA requires redaction of welfare recipients’ exempt information contained in SHA’s grievance hearing decisions. Applicable federal regulations do not…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. City of Lakewood v. KoenigWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Lyft, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Skagit County Public Hospital District No. 304 v. Skagit County Public Hospital District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hobbs v. Washington State Auditor's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API