Legal Opinion
People v. Elliott
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1889PublishedCited by 31 opinions
Exceptions from recorder’s court of Detroit. (Swift, J. j Information for promoting a lottery. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
The respondent was convicted in the recorder’s court in the city of Detroit, upon an information charging him with setting up and promoting a lottery for money. The information against him is filed under section 9331, How. Stat., and is as follows:
“The Recorder’s Court oe the City or Detroit:
“In the name of the people of the State of Michigan, George P. Robison, prosecuting attorney in and for the said county of Wayne, who prosecutes for and on behalf of the people of said State in said court, comes now here in said court, in the July term thereof, A. D. 1888, and gives the said court here to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hull v. . RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Wilkinson v. . GillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Randle v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Attorney General v. Powerpick Player's Club of Michigan, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. DaltonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.