Trail v. Tulsa Street Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ESTES, C.
Loretta Trail sued Tulsa Street Railway Company for damages alleged to have been sustained from personal injuries received by her in alighting from a street car of defendant. She was a passenger for hire on such car going north on Main street. She signaled for the purpose of alighting at the intersection of Main and Cameron streets. The track of defendant turned to the west from Main upon Camer-ún. Plaintiff claims that the car was not stopped until it reached the curve making such turn, at which place plaintiff alighted. Her version of the accident is:
“Q. What did you do…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terrell, Atkins Harvin v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Gannaway v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. ZirkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Loggins v. . Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. LattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brandenburg v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Steinburg v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Wullbrandt v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938