Legal Opinion

Wullbrandt v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1938No. 27253. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— This action was brought to recover for personal injuries plaintiff claims to have suffered in alighting from a street car in the city of Seattle as a result of the negligent operation of the car by an employee of the defendant. The appeal is from the judgment of dismissal rendered upon plaintiff’s refusal to plead further after a demurrer had been sustained to the complaint.

The allegations of fact, admitted by the demurrer to be true, are as follows:

About 4:40 p. m., December 1, 1937, appellant was a passenger on one of respondent’s street cars which was proceeding southward on Third…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Gabrielsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Tobin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Henry v. Grant Street Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Lindgren v. Puget Sound International Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Larson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Deason v. Greyhound CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Parker v. Birmingham Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API