Terrell, Atkins Harvin v. Proctor
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. E. Ezell, Judge. Action by T. E. Proctor and another against Terrell, Atkins & Harvin. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.
Appellees T. E. Proctor and C. E. Canterbury, plaintiffs below, sued appellants, alleging; That about May 20, 1913, plaintiffs entered into a contract whereby they agreed to purchase from defendants all of a certain stock of cattle estimated at 2,000 head, more or less, ranging in tbe Frank Payne pasture near Spofford, and to pay $20 in gold per head, f. o. b. cars Spof-ford, Tex., all calves born since January 1, 1913, to be thrown in free of cost; that by the terms of the contract the cattle were to be delivered in three separate bunches, the first to be delivered within ten 'days from date…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BelcherTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Bourland v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
- Galveston & Western Railway Co. v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Daugherty v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Corzelius v. OliverTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Hamon v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Copeland v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- City of Brownsville v. TumlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Clem v. FulghumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.