Haubert v. Mausshardt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Defendant's appeal from the judgment and an order refusing him a new trial.
On the 26th of February, 1886, plaintiff sold to defendant the wine in his cellar in Sonoma Valley, for twenty-eight and one half cents per gallon. After the parties had come to an agreement, defendant caused the *435contract to be written out by a friend, who prepared two copies, supposed to be duplicates. By mistake, however, in one copy the price was put at twenty and one half cents per gallon. Defendant took them to plaintiff, who . read one of the contracts, which chanced to be the correct one, and finding…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Dellapiazza v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Michigan Stove Co. v. A. H. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Brown v. CoffeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- City Lumber Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Lowe v. BlumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.