Rossi v. Beaulieu Vineyard
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. The fapts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action to recover a balance of eight hundred dollars, alleged to be due the plaintiff under a certain contract, made and entered into between the said plaintiff, carrying on business under the name of A. Rossi & Co., in the city of San Francisco, and the defendant.
The trial was had before the court without a jury, and judgment was awarded the plaintiff in the sum of $561.09 and costs of suit.
This appeal is by the defendant from the judgment under ' the alternative method of taking such appeals. (Code Civ. Proc., secs. 941a, 941b, 941c.)
The defendant, as indicated by the entitlement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Brown v. CoffeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Aetna Indem. Co. v. Altadena Min. Etc. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Altadena Mining & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bowers v. Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Brown v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Webster v. KlassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kaneda v. KanedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Astor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.