Legal Opinion

Abercrombie v. Davies

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 16, 1956PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This is the decision on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’' motion asks this Court to declare invalid an agreement between certain stockholders and their agents dealing with corporate stockholder and director action. Plaintiffs are not parties to the agreement which concerns a Delaware corporation of which these plaintiffs are stockholders.

In 1947, a Delaware corporation known as American Independent Oil Company (“American”) was organized to exploit a concession for oil and gas in the Kuwait-Saudi Arabian Neutral Zone in the Middle East. The three…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. McQuade v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Abercrombie v. DaviesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  3. Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  4. Mayer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  5. Lehrman v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API