Legal Opinion
McQuade v. Stoneham
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1934PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pound, Ch. J.
The action is brought to compel specific performance of an agreement between the parties, entered into to secure the control of National Exhibition Company, also called the Baseball Club (New York Nationals or “ Giants ”)■ This was one of Stoneham’s enterprises which used the New York polo grounds for its home games. McGraw was manager of the Giants. McQuade was at the time the contract was entered into a City Magistrate. He resigned December 8, 1930.
Defendant Stoneham became the owner of 1,306 shares, or a majority of the stock of National Exhibition Company. Plaintiff and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Brightman v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Fells v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Faulds v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Ronnen v. Ajax Electric Motor Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Sterling Industries, Inc. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Zion v. KurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.