Legal Opinion

Watson v. Odell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1921No. 3576PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Wilson McCarthy, Judge. Action by Edward IT. Watson against George T. O’Dell and others to recover a commission for procuring a purchaser for the property of an irrigation company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff: appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.

The averments of the complaint are in substance (1) That on and prior to June 15, 1915, the Richlands Irrigation Company was a Utah corporation; (2) that the corporation owned certain water rights and real estate, consisting of an option to purchase 20,000 acre-feet of water from the Deseret Irrigation • Company, a preference right under the Carey Act of 10,800 acres of land in Millard county, and certain water rights and reservoir sites; (3) that the Richlands Company represented to plaintiff that it desired to sell its holdings to any one who would pay $260,000 for them; (4) that defendants…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Condict v. . CowdreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Dole v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Lindley v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Karr v. MoffettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Baugh v. DarleyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Goen v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Grommet v. NewmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API