Legal Opinion

In Re Custody of NAK

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 15, 2002No. C3-01-170, C6-01-678PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

649 N.W.2d 166 (2002)

In the Matter of the CUSTODY OF N.A.K., DOB 4/10/92.

Christopher Rodgers, et al., Petitioners, Respondents,

v.

Robert J. Knauff, Petitioner, Appellant.

Nos. C3-01-170, C6-01-678.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 15, 2002.

Mark A. Olson, Burnsville, for Appellant.

Gary A. Debele, Walling & Berg, P.A., Minneapolis, for Respondents.

John Remington Graham, Quebec, Canada, for Amicus Curiae R-KIDS of Minnesota.

Laurie Hanson, Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis, John M. Jerabek, Minneapolis, for Amicus Curiae Minnesota Kinship Caregivers Association.

Gail Chang Bohr, Children's Law Center…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Fish v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Shurupoff v. VockrothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Lewis-Miller v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. In re the Welfare of J.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API