Legal Opinion

In re Schlesinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 24, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in October 1990. He has practiced law in Albany.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to suspend respondent from the practice of law pending consideration of disciplinary charges against him. Respondent has not replied to the motion.

The papers submitted on the motion indicate that during an oral examination of respondent by petitioner held July 20, *6841993, he admitted that he converted $25,262.34 from the bank account of his client, Charles Packard, for his personal use. He also claimed to have repaid about $10,000.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re DardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re OswaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API