In re Baltimore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department, seeks an order suspending respondent from practice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (ii) and (iii), pending resolution of the charges against him.
Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Department on April 15, 1935 and maintains an office for the practice of law within this Department.
On February 6, 1987, respondent was served with notice that the Committee had received several complaints, charging him with professional misconduct involving seven different clients and legal matters.…
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re WechslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re BaltimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989